What is it with us guys? This last month seems like it's been the month of 'guys being guys'. A good friend nearly left his wife and kids of seven years. Another friend broke off a serious relationship he was in and stopped being friends with the girl. In another friendship, the guy has stopped talking to or communicating with the girl, without saying why or talking about it. In all of the situations, the women are left wondering what happened, 'Did he ever really care about me?' or 'Did our friendship really matter?'
Now, don't mistakenly think that I'm looking at this from the 'outside.' I will forever carry the shame of doing the same to the first girl I ever dated, a dear friend and an incredible woman. I too brought an abrupt end to a friendship that left her wondering 'What happened?'. And, as a result, I lost an incredible friendship.
So, why talk about this? This last week I was talking to a friend that was here with JBU. He mentioned how he had done the exact same thing in his first dating relationship. That, along with everything else that has been happening in friendships around me this month, got me thinking about why it is that men, all over the world, walk away from the women who were so important in their lives, leaving the women to wonder, 'What happened?'.
Don't expect some epiphany in answer to that question. I think there's a myriad of different reasons. Perhaps personal insecurities or problems with commitment. Sometimes it's just immaturity, not in a heavy handed demeaning sense, but a lack of experience - they simply don't realize what they're doing or how to handle the situation. At times this comes from realizing that, whether for them or for the girl, the relationship isn't the best place for them, they realize things need to change - but then fail to bring about that change in a healthy way.
Whatever the reason, one can't stop at the 'reason' as an explanation or excuse. What are guys to do about their 'cut 'n run' tendency in friendships and relationships?
People believe the Bible for a number of different reasons (don't worry, this isn't a sermon. :-) One of the reasons I've come to trust what it has to say is that it not only explains the world I live in well, but doesn't stop at the explanation (allowing that explanation to be used as an 'excuse' - such as 'it's the way I'm wired'), but rather calls its reader to something more. The word to describe it, which we don't use in modern parlance, is 'exhortation.' Scripture exhorts its reader - that is, urges or calls them to an action - to something that is not 'natural,' but is something that is better - often better personally and interpersonally. (For example, not murdering is a 'healthy' restraint on our natural urge for revenge in order to preserve an orderly community).
So, the question I've been asking myself is what might Scripture have to say about a man's tendency to 'cut 'n run'? Does Scripture go beyond just saying 'guy's struggle with commitment and/or communication' to offer anything helpful? Let me offer this as what I've thought about this week:
In college, my paper for Dr. Castleman's 'New Testament Book Study: Pauline Epistles' was on Eph. 5:20-6:9. For those familiar with this passage, they'll know it's one of the passages on submission that gets completely abused by domineering husbands and fundamentalist churches that see no role for women in the church or in marriages. In doing the paper, there were two really important Greek words that don't come across with the same meaning in our English translations:
upotasso (5:21, 22, 24)
and
agape (5:25, 28, 33)
Verse 21 first uses
upotasso and is the introduction to the rest of the chapter and the first part of the next chapter. The verse reads:
'Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ.'
Yikes!! Submit. A word that has been used far too often to abuse people - whether women, slaves, or employees. To think that Paul has in mind that type of submission is confusing the modern understanding of the word for the Greek definition - for the idea that Paul did have in mind. Submission here, as meant in the Greek, is better defined: 'to willingly place oneself under another.' It's a choice the subject makes, NOT an action forced on the subject. Paul is calling people to willingly submit their own desires or needs to those of others . No one chooses for someone else to be more important then them without a great level of respect, love, and admiration for that other person.
Second, and JUST as important, is the fact that it calls ALL people to this submission, both husband and wife. Far too often, most likely because of the way the heading splits this section in most English bibles, people simply start with verse 22, which calls the wife to submit to her husband, disregarding this FOUNDATIONAL exhortation for BOTH people in the relationship to submit. It's with the foundational statement in verse 21 - for all people to submit to one another out of love for Christ - that Paul then elaborates on what this looks like in several different social relationships (marriage, families, employment). Paul begins first with what it looks like for a husband and a wife to willingly see the other person as more important than themselves.
Since this post is about men, not women, I'm going to skip verses 22-24. Suffice it to say, however, the women's submission is
her choice and is choosing to respect and honor her husband BECAUSE of who he IS and how he honors HER - he sacrifices himself for her, as Christ did for the church (vs. 23). It's not about women submitting to an abusive, domineering, or foolish husband. It's about her being loved by a husband that cares about her more than himself. (Relationships that actually look like this are a BEAUTIFUL thing!)
Okay, on to the men, since this is a post about men - including me - and us growing in the way we care for the women in our lives. So, what does Paul have to say about us, when it comes to thinking about women as more important then ourselves, how are we supposed to 'submit' to them? 'Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her' (vs. 25). Yikes! Dying for someone else is what Christ called the ultimate act of love and is only possible for a man with, excuse the phrase, real '
kahones'. No room for little boys or selfish adolescents here - it's a calling to sacrifice - to willingly walk into and embrace our own death. Here's where the second Greek word becomes important:
agape.
As you may already know, there are four words for love in the Greek:
Eros - a passionate, physical, sensual love (where the English word 'erotic' comes from)
Philia - the sort of love present in friendships, between family members, or for an activity
Storge - the love parents have for their kids; a natural affection; used, in ancient Greek almost exclusively within family context
Agape - the love one has for a spouse, a love of commitment
It's the last type of love that Paul uses when he writes about how the husband is to love the wife - and is the same word he uses to describes Christ's love for the church. In the New Testament, this Greek word insinuates the commitment of one's life. In John 15:12, Jesus calls his disciples to love others as he has loved them. In 2 Timothy 4:10, Paul writes of Demas' love for the world that causes Demas to forsake his friendship to Paul.
In the New Testament, the context of
agape is one of commitment. Even more so, when in reference to Christ or God, it is a love of self-sacrificial commitment. It's one of the reasons that 1 John 4:8 is such a powerful verse, 'God is love.' Such a simple verse encapsulates so much. A God that came to earth to die for us, to sacrifice himself, that we might respond to and embrace his love. Love which, as the Old Testament describes it, is 'steadfast love' (the phrase is used 196 times in the Old Testament, all in reference to God's character or what he calls his people to).
So, what does this have to do with our tendency, as men, to 'cut 'n run'? Here's how I think it relates. Paul could have called us to
eros women - to love them in a sensual way, but honestly, that comes naturally and doesn't call us to anything more. He could even have called us to
philia or
storge love them - and sure enough, there are a number of friends in our lives that we have affection for or see as 'sisters' - again, in many ways, this comes naturally. But
agape - that's a whole different ball game.
It's the type of love that calls men to be more then they are naturally. It calls them to something that is, at times, scary, but doesn't leave any wiggle room for changing their mind. It's a love of commitment, regardless. It's not a conditional love that simply sums up the other types of love. It doesn't leave room for:
1. 'I used to think she was really attractive, but I just don't find her as beautiful anymore.' (
eros)
2. 'We used to be friends and really clicked, but we just don't seem to click anymore.' (
philia)
3. (
Storge...hmm, only examples I can come up with are ones about loving her like you love your mom, which just sounds weird.)
Agape doesn't leave any wiggle room. It doesn't leave a 'way out'. It's not meant to, because, as men, we seem to naturally find the 'wiggle room' and the 'way out.' That's part of the 'cut 'n run' immaturity within us - if we let ourselves, we'll, more often then not, find a reason - eventually or when things get difficult - to not stick with it.
You know what else men are often accused of? You guessed it, not communicating.
Agape doesn't leave room for us to say 'I'm a guy and so I just don't talk that much.' Sorry, it's not there. Rather,
agape challenges us to a long-standing commitment that goes beyond affection, friendship, or sexual attraction. It's a love that CHOOSES or DECIDES that, 'Whatever comes, I am committed to you. I will have the conversations that are uncomfortable and I will stick this out till I die.'
That, gentleman, is what we are called to. Scared? We probably should be. Think of it as going into war. War will show a man's fear for what it is, but the hero's and the 'real men' are the one's that walk into battle, committed to victory and sacrificing themselves for those around them. Just like men who run away from battle are 'cowards,' so are we, as men, when we 'cut 'n run' in our relationships. When we fail to step into those difficult conversations. When we become something less than men of our word and fail to remain faithful to that commitment we made.
I'm as guilty as the next one. Yet, I know this is what I'm called to and I know it's what every woman I've ever known, deserves. 'Submission' sounds like an entirely different thing when a woman is loved like this - when she's in a relationship where she never has to question her husband's commitment to her - that he will remain faithful, loyal, and care for her more than himself.
That, my friends, is what we're called to. To grow up, to mature, into men who leave 'childish ways behind' - the 'cut 'n run' method - and be men that commit - to have those difficult conversations and to honor and love the women in our lives regardless.
I haven't done this well in the past, but I will push forward and work to grow, that it may describe the man I become. I challenge you, if you're a guy, to step up to the plate with me. Take on the challenge. Become more than you've been. Choose to love the women in your life in a way that will make you the man God's called you to be!
In our culture people excuse their broken relationships away by saying things like, “I fell in love with her, and then I fell out of love. That’s that.” Look: people don’t fall in love. They fall in holes, but they don’t fall in love. You choose love.-
A friend's pastor-